CoreWeave vs AWS
GPU cloud pricing, reliability scores, compliance certifications, and SKU overlap — derived from GPUAdvisor's regularly tracked dataset. All prices are per-GPU-hour on-demand unless noted.
Data Summary
On H100 on-demand, CoreWeave is 10% cheaper per GPU-hour as of Jul 2026.
Both providers offer B200, H100, A100, L40S — direct price comparison is available across those families.
CoreWeave exclusively offers: H200, L40, RTX.
Per-GPU On-Demand Pricing
| GPU | CoreWeave | AWS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B200 | $8.60/GPU-hr | $14.24/GPU-hr | CoreWeave −40% |
| H200 | $6.31/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| H100 | $6.16/GPU-hr | $6.88/GPU-hr | CoreWeave −10% |
| A100 | $2.70/GPU-hr | $2.74/GPU-hr | CoreWeave −2% |
| L40S | $2.25/GPU-hr | $2.00/GPU-hr | AWS −11% |
| L40 | $1.25/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| RTX | $2.50/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
Regularly tracked · last tracked Jul 2026 · per-GPU-hour on-demand rates · providers with per-node pricing divided by GPU count
Provider Scores
Hyperscaler-grade infra at specialist pricing.
Most complete cloud. Premium pricing. Best SLA.
Scores 1–5. Cost = value for money; Reliability = uptime/SLA; Ecosystem = integrations & tooling. Methodology →
Compliance Certifications
| Certification | CoreWeave | AWS |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Type II | Type II |
| HIPAA | BAA | BAA |
| FedRAMP | In Progress | High (GovCloud) |
| ISO 27001 | Certified | Certified |
| GDPR | Compliant | Compliant |
Full compliance matrix → /provider-compliance
More Comparisons