Hyperstack vs Lambda
GPU cloud pricing, reliability scores, compliance certifications, and SKU overlap — derived from GPUAdvisor's regularly tracked dataset. All prices are per-GPU-hour on-demand unless noted.
Data Summary
On H100 on-demand, Hyperstack is 37% cheaper per GPU-hour as of Jul 2026.
Both providers offer B200, H200, H100, A100, A6000 — direct price comparison is available across those families.
Hyperstack exclusively offers: B300, L40, A4000, RTX.
Lambda exclusively offers: Quadro, Tesla.
Per-GPU On-Demand Pricing
| GPU | Hyperstack | Lambda | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B300 | $7.40/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| B200 | $6.00/GPU-hr | $6.99/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −14% |
| H200 | $3.99/GPU-hr | $2.29/GPU-hr | Lambda −43% |
| H100 | $2.50/GPU-hr | $3.99/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −37% |
| A100 | $1.35/GPU-hr | $2.79/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −52% |
| L40 | $1.00/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| A4000 | $0.15/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| A6000 | $0.50/GPU-hr | $1.09/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −54% |
| Quadro | not offered | $0.69/GPU-hr | — |
| RTX | $1.85/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| Tesla | not offered | $0.79/GPU-hr | — |
Regularly tracked · last tracked Jul 2026 · per-GPU-hour on-demand rates · providers with per-node pricing divided by GPU count
Provider Scores
Zero-egress European cloud with strong price-performance on H-series.
Best $/GPU for pure compute. No ecosystem overhead.
Scores 1–5. Cost = value for money; Reliability = uptime/SLA; Ecosystem = integrations & tooling. Methodology →
Compliance Certifications
| Certification | Hyperstack | Lambda |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Certified | Type II |
| HIPAA | — | — |
| FedRAMP | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | Certified |
| GDPR | Compliant | Compliant |
Full compliance matrix → /provider-compliance
More Comparisons