CoreWeave vs Crusoe
GPU cloud pricing, reliability scores, compliance certifications, and SKU overlap — derived from GPUAdvisor's regularly tracked dataset. All prices are per-GPU-hour on-demand unless noted.
Data Summary
On H100 on-demand, Crusoe is 37% cheaper per GPU-hour as of Jul 2026.
Both providers offer H100, A100 — direct price comparison is available across those families.
CoreWeave exclusively offers: B200, H200, L40S, L40, RTX.
Crusoe exclusively offers: MI300X.
Per-GPU On-Demand Pricing
| GPU | CoreWeave | Crusoe | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B200 | $8.60/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| H200 | $6.31/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| H100 | $6.16/GPU-hr | $3.90/GPU-hr | Crusoe −37% |
| A100 | $2.70/GPU-hr | $2.00/GPU-hr | Crusoe −26% |
| L40S | $2.25/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| L40 | $1.25/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| MI300X | not offered | $3.45/GPU-hr | — |
| RTX | $2.50/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
Regularly tracked · last tracked Jul 2026 · per-GPU-hour on-demand rates · providers with per-node pricing divided by GPU count
Provider Scores
Hyperscaler-grade infra at specialist pricing.
Zero egress fees. OpenAI Stargate infrastructure partner.
Scores 1–5. Cost = value for money; Reliability = uptime/SLA; Ecosystem = integrations & tooling. Methodology →
Compliance Certifications
| Certification | CoreWeave | Crusoe |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Type II | Type II |
| HIPAA | BAA | BAA |
| FedRAMP | In Progress | In Progress |
| ISO 27001 | Certified | Certified |
| GDPR | Compliant | Compliant |
Full compliance matrix → /provider-compliance
More Comparisons