Thunder Compute vs Lambda
GPU cloud pricing, reliability scores, compliance certifications, and SKU overlap — derived from GPUAdvisor's regularly tracked dataset. All prices are per-GPU-hour on-demand unless noted.
Data Summary
On H100 on-demand, Thunder Compute is 20% cheaper per GPU-hour as of Jul 2026.
Both providers offer H100, A100 — direct price comparison is available across those families.
Thunder Compute exclusively offers: L40, RTX.
Lambda exclusively offers: B200, H200, A6000, Quadro, Tesla.
Per-GPU On-Demand Pricing
| GPU | Thunder Compute | Lambda | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B200 | not offered | $6.99/GPU-hr | — |
| H200 | not offered | $2.29/GPU-hr | — |
| H100 | $3.20/GPU-hr | $3.99/GPU-hr | Thunder Compute −20% |
| A100 | $1.09/GPU-hr | $2.79/GPU-hr | Thunder Compute −61% |
| L40 | $0.79/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| A6000 | not offered | $1.09/GPU-hr | — |
| Quadro | not offered | $0.69/GPU-hr | — |
| RTX | $0.35/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| Tesla | not offered | $0.79/GPU-hr | — |
Regularly tracked · last tracked Jul 2026 · per-GPU-hour on-demand rates · providers with per-node pricing divided by GPU count
Provider Scores
YC S24 GPU cloud. Zero egress. GPU-over-TCP virtualized instances (1x–2x GPU configs). A100 80GB: $1.09/GPU-hr single-GPU; multi-GPU configs priced above that rate (4×–8× ≈$1.49/GPU-hr). Do not assume linear scaling. US + Canada (provider-stated, July 2026). H100 PCIe $2.19/GPU-hr. regularly tracked · last tracked July 27, 2026.
Best $/GPU for pure compute. No ecosystem overhead.
Scores 1–5. Cost = value for money; Reliability = uptime/SLA; Ecosystem = integrations & tooling. Methodology →
Compliance Certifications
| Certification | Thunder Compute | Lambda |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | — | Type II |
| HIPAA | — | — |
| FedRAMP | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | Certified |
| GDPR | DPA published | Compliant |
Full compliance matrix → /provider-compliance
More Comparisons