Hyperstack vs CoreWeave
GPU cloud pricing, reliability scores, compliance certifications, and SKU overlap — derived from GPUAdvisor's regularly tracked dataset. All prices are per-GPU-hour on-demand unless noted.
Data Summary
On H100 on-demand, Hyperstack is 59% cheaper per GPU-hour as of Jul 2026.
Both providers offer B200, H200, H100, A100, L40, RTX — direct price comparison is available across those families.
Hyperstack exclusively offers: B300, A4000, A6000.
CoreWeave exclusively offers: L40S.
Per-GPU On-Demand Pricing
| GPU | Hyperstack | CoreWeave | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B300 | $7.40/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| B200 | $6.00/GPU-hr | $8.60/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −30% |
| H200 | $3.99/GPU-hr | $6.31/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −37% |
| H100 | $2.50/GPU-hr | $6.16/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −59% |
| A100 | $1.35/GPU-hr | $2.70/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −50% |
| L40S | not offered | $2.25/GPU-hr | — |
| L40 | $1.00/GPU-hr | $1.25/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −20% |
| A4000 | $0.15/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| A6000 | $0.50/GPU-hr | not offered | — |
| RTX | $1.85/GPU-hr | $2.50/GPU-hr | Hyperstack −26% |
Regularly tracked · last tracked Jul 2026 · per-GPU-hour on-demand rates · providers with per-node pricing divided by GPU count
Provider Scores
Zero-egress European cloud with strong price-performance on H-series.
Hyperscaler-grade infra at specialist pricing.
Scores 1–5. Cost = value for money; Reliability = uptime/SLA; Ecosystem = integrations & tooling. Methodology →
Compliance Certifications
| Certification | Hyperstack | CoreWeave |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Certified | Type II |
| HIPAA | — | BAA |
| FedRAMP | — | In Progress |
| ISO 27001 | — | Certified |
| GDPR | Compliant | Compliant |
Full compliance matrix → /provider-compliance
More Comparisons